Arkansas · 2026 State of Childcare Report (Score 61/100) | Beverly Research

Arkansas · 2026 State of Childcare Report

Beverly Research · May 2026

State of Childcare Score 61/100 Tier Moderate National rank among states #10 of 50
Beverly Research — 2026 State of Childcare Report
THE 2026 REPORT FORArkansas

City spotlight — 1 Arkansas city

Little Rock63Moderate

Dimension scores

Affordability 79 Supply 58 Workforce 74 Family Strain 36 Policy Support 43 National state average

Source: Beverly Research, 2026 State of Childcare Index. Dashed line: national state average.

National rank position

Arkansas sits at 61 across all 50 US states Worst 23 Median 51 Best 71 61

Source: Beverly Research. Range across 50 US states.

As the United States celebrates its 250th anniversary this year, Arkansas has one city among the largest 250 in the nation.

An Arkansas family pays $9,251 a year to put an infant in a licensed center, the fifth-lowest figure in the country and barely half the national $17,163. That number, set against a $58,773 median household income, also explains why a state with no paid family leave, no aspirational pre-K reach, and a median early-educator wage of $13.07 an hour has quietly emerged as the country's tenth-best childcare market on the 2026 score — and the highest-ranked Southern state outside Florida and Virginia. Arkansas's score is built almost entirely on cost and capacity rather than policy ambition: 4.47 licensed establishments per 1,000 kids under 5, an 8.2 percent supply gap, and prices that let working families clear the math. The data sit below.

Key highlights & actionable takeaways


Affordability — 80/100

Arkansas families pay a forward-projected 2025 average of $9,251 a year for full-time infant care at a licensed center — among the five lowest figures in the country and roughly 54 percent of the $17,163 national average. Toddler care runs $8,874, preschool $8,023, and family child care homes price about $1,600 below center care across the board.

Set against the state's $58,773 median household income, infant center care consumes 15.7 percent of HHI for a typical Arkansas family. That is well above the 7-percent federal affordability threshold, but it is also six full points below the national 21.9 percent — the difference between "expensive" and "ruinous." A year of infant center care equals 0.84 months of median rent in Arkansas, compared with 1.06 months nationally; a family that can cover housing here can usually cover one child in care, which is the rough definition of a workable market.

Within the state, prices skew lower in rural counties and rise toward Pulaski and Benton Counties. Even the highest-priced county brackets in Arkansas, however, sit below the national median — a structural feature of a low-cost-of-living state with low underlying provider wages.

Supply — 57/100

Arkansas posts a supply score that is unusually high for a Southern state. The Bipartisan Policy Center counts 137,400 children under 5 with potential care need against 154,660 licensed slots — a notional surplus that resolves to a small 8.2 percent gap once the broader denominator of all under-5 children with working parents (222,465) is applied. The state operates 816 licensed establishments, or 4.47 per 1,000 kids under 5 — above the 4.21 national rate.

Capacity is concentrated in the Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway metro, the Bentonville-Rogers-Springdale corridor in Northwest Arkansas, and the Fort Smith area. In rural Delta counties supply thins quickly, and the state's headline gap masks pockets where the nearest licensed center is a 20-minute drive. But the statewide arithmetic — supply roughly tracking demand on a one-to-one basis when measured against working families — is the kind of number that most states in the South would trade their pre-K appropriations for.

Arkansas's establishment density also benefits from a relatively healthy family-child-care home sector. While most states have seen FCC programs close at a faster rate than centers since 2019, Arkansas's regulatory framework — which permits up to 10 children per home with relatively contained licensing requirements — has kept the small-program supply intact in towns where a full center is not economically viable. That structural choice is doing a lot of the work in the supply score.

Workforce — 73/100

Arkansas's workforce score is its second-best dimension, and it earns the rank on relative — not absolute — terms. Median early-educator pay is $13.07 an hour, or $27,180 a year, which is the lowest hourly figure in this batch. But Arkansas's living-wage threshold for a single adult is $20.01, so that median wage equates to 65.3 percent of a living wage — the highest ratio of the four South Central states and three points above the 62.6 percent national benchmark.

The state employs 6,200 childcare workers in the SOC 39-9011 occupation. The implication is consistent with the supply story: a workforce that is paid badly in absolute dollars but not as badly as in higher-cost states, in a sector where the cost of replacement labor (retail, fast food) sits at similar wage points. Turnover pressure exists; it is not as acute as in Louisiana or Oklahoma.

The Arkansas Better Chance for School Success program and a handful of school-district partnerships have created a small but visible pay differential for credentialed early educators in the Little Rock and Northwest Arkansas regions, which keeps experienced staff in the field longer than the median wage alone would predict. The dimension score — the second-best among the four states in this batch — captures both pieces: a state where childcare pay is structurally low but where it is not catastrophically out of step with what a worker can earn doing comparably skilled work elsewhere in the local economy.

Family strain — 36.3/100

Mothers of children under 6 in Arkansas participate in the labor force at 67.97 percent — almost exactly the 68.21 percent national rate, and the highest figure in this four-state batch. That is striking in a state with limited paid leave and middling subsidy reach, and it suggests that the Arkansas affordability picture and intact rural support networks together make work feasible for a wider slice of mothers than the policy reading would predict.

The harder number is single-parent share: 34.25 percent of households with children, two and a half points above the national figure. Arkansas single-parent families face the same childcare math as everyone else, with one income to absorb it. The 36.3 family-strain score reflects this distributional asymmetry — a labor-force participation profile close to the national average sitting on top of a single-parent share that is meaningfully higher.

Policy support — 43.1/100

This is Arkansas's weakest dimension. The state's Arkansas Better Chance pre-K program enrolls 32 percent of 4-year-olds and 19 percent of 3-year-olds — the latter figure unusually strong for a Southern state — and meets 8 of 10 NIEER quality benchmarks, which puts Arkansas among the better-quality state pre-K systems in the country even if total enrollment trails. Per-child spending of $5,675 is mid-pack.

CCDF subsidy reaches 16.6 percent of eligible children, serving about 16,600 kids per month. Head Start enrolls 8,978, including 3,513 in Early Head Start. Arkansas, like every state in this batch, has no state paid family or medical leave program. The dimension score lags because the package as a whole — modest enrollment, modest subsidy reach, no paid leave — does not reach the policy ambition that distinguishes the higher-scoring Northeast and Midwest states, even with the quality of the pre-K Arkansas does fund.


City spotlight

Arkansas has only one city in the index's measured set of 250: Little Rock (64/100, Moderate, ranked 27th nationally — the only Arkansas city in the 2026 score). Little Rock posts strong supply (80.5) and a 73.6 affordability score, with infant care running 17.1 percent of household income in Pulaski County. Its 53.4 workforce reading is above the national norm, and the city's 48.6 family-strain score exceeds the state average. The composite picture is consistent with the state-level read: Little Rock outperforms peer Southern capitals because cost is contained and slots are available, even where wages and policy lag.

The Bentonville-Rogers-Springdale corridor in Northwest Arkansas — driven by Walmart, Tyson, and J.B. Hunt employer concentration — is not in the city set but is widely understood within the industry as the state's tightest childcare market on the demand side, with longer waitlists than Little Rock despite higher wages.

In-home care in Arkansas

Arkansas's in-home care market is shaped by two forces: a low-cost center market that prices most families out of the nanny calculus for one child, and concentrated professional demand in Northwest Arkansas's corporate corridor where two-physician, two-attorney, and two-executive households sit at densities that change the math. Beverly Research's intake data shows full-time live-out nanny rates in Little Rock and Bentonville running $20-28 an hour — meaningfully below the national $25-35 band, but still annualizing above $40,000, well in excess of two children in center care here.

The functional substitute for many Arkansas families is informal: grandparent care, sibling care, and older-cousin care remain standard, and the state's mothers' LFP figure plausibly leans on those networks more heavily than national data captures. Au pair placements are rare outside the Bentonville metro. Nanny shares between two families occur in Little Rock and Bentonville but have not reached the scale seen in larger Southern metros.


Methodology: The the score is a 0-100 composite score across five dimensions — Affordability (30 pts), Supply (25 pts), Workforce Health (15 pts), Family Strain (15 pts), and Policy Support (15 pts). State scores roll up county-level price and supply data to a population-weighted average. Full methodology and data sources: beverly.io/research/methodology.

Sources: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 2019-2023 5-year estimates; U.S. Department of Labor Women's Bureau National Database of Childcare Prices (2018 base, 2023 DOL-projected, 2025 forward-projected); U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics OEWS (May 2024) and QCEW NAICS 624410 (2024); Bipartisan Policy Center 2026 state childcare data PDFs; Buffett Early Childhood Institute / Child Care Aware childcaregap.org (Sept 2025); NIEER State of Preschool Yearbook 2024; HHS ACF CCDF FY2023; National Partnership for Women & Families (March 2026); EPI Family Budget Calculator (2024).

Methodology. The State of Childcare Index is a 0-100 composite score across five dimensions: Affordability (30 pts), Supply (25 pts), Workforce Health (15 pts), Family Strain (15 pts), and Policy Support (15 pts). Each dimension draws on publicly available federal data: U.S. Census ACS (5-year), DOL Women's Bureau NDCP, BLS OEWS and QCEW, the Buffett/BPC/CCAoA childcaregap.org dataset, NIEER State of Preschool, and HHS ACF CCDF reports. City-level prices and supply use the city's primary containing county. Policy Support is measured at the state level. Full methodology and data sources: /research/methodology.